I've often been terrified before traveling to foreign countries outside of the "safety" of Europe.

I planned a trip to Ecuador and worried for weeks before going. Someone told me about a woman he'd met in Brazil who'd been harassed in Ecuador. I read about pickpockets and thieves and how careful women had to be at night.Giza Pyramids and camels

The same thing happened before going to Egypt. All I could think of was the massacre I'd remembered that had taken place there 15 years ago. As if the next one were planned for the very time, place and day I'd be at, say, the Valley of the Kings or the Pyramids at Giza 15 years later.

And people around me freaked out when I said I was going to Mexico last fall. They'd read too much about kidnappings and drug-related killings. As had I. Although in that case, I wasn't very concerned. Can't explain why.

But while staying with a family in Guadalajara, Mexico, taking the city bus to Spanish classes and sightseeing around the downtown, I have to say, I didn't see one person carted off by a drug cartel member or shoved into a car and driven off for a ransom call.Guadalajara family-Ellen Perlman

Life seemed pretty normal despite the horror stories in the paper. Which are mostly about the border states, in any case, not all of Mexico.

This kind of thinking is understandable (I've GOT to say that, don't I, since I engage in it sometimes) but also not particularly rational.

I live in Washington, D.C. I watched the smoke from the 9/11 plane that crashed into the Pentagon rise into the sky as I made my way home that day. Terrorists had attacked within two miles of where I worked and within five miles of where I live.

Do I think Washington is now an unsafe place for people to visit? Absolutely not. 

Yet when I read stories and tales of woe in Ecuador and Egypt, I assumed those were dangerous places all the time.

That's why I liked this story on solo female travel in Latin America. The writer says it's, "…very easy to
get paranoid about visiting certain countries and cities but this is
totally unwarranted." Some of these places in South America are safer and nicer than parts of Europe and North American, she points out.

I can vouch for that, if only anecdotally. The one and only place I was ever mugged was in a Boston train station in one of the nicest downtown neighborhoods. It was during my college days.

And I'm worried about going to South America? Should I be worried about going to Boston now that I was mugged? (For the record, I've been back to Boston many, many times since then with no problem at all. Surprise, surprise.)

There's a "pernicious mythology" that a solo female traveler is prone to all sorts of drama and trouble on the road, the writer continues. "Many people instantly exaggerate the perils and dwell on a single
woman's vulnerability. Often this doom-ridden response is just an
excuse for their own timidity of spirit."

Often I read safety tips for women that involve dressing modestly, not flashing expensive jewelry, being careful walking around at night. Well, guess what? These are good general safety tips for any place you're not familiar with. Just as it's important to learn the cultural cues regarding eye contact and hand motions and other signals you might not want to send mistakenly in foreign cultures.

But it doesn't mean you shouldn't go places.

I met an American family in Buenos Aires that had been ripped off by a two-person band of thieves. The wife was left with the bags while the husband and child went someplace to get snacks.

These guys must have been watching the family for a little while because when one guy walked up to her and distracted her with a question as he pointed to a map, and then left, she discovered the backpack she'd taken her eye off, the one with all the valuables, was gone. They knew just what to take.

No fuss, no muss, no guns, knives, pushing or shoving. Just clever thieves working a vulnerable family member. Yet no one tells families not to visit foreign countries. Somehow people think there's more safety in numbers. Maybe. Sometimes.

I just don't buy fear for safety as an excuse to write off a whole country (other than perhaps countries at war or where the U.S. State Department warns people to stay away).

Not if you've done your research and know what you're getting into. You can't rely on your friend's friend's story, or tales from, say, an aunt's coworker's husband, telling you a country is unsafe because they had a problem.

I understand the fears. I've got them myself regarding certain places.

But then I remember my two British friends who were afraid of visiting New York City. That's because everything they saw on the news involved policemen carrying guns and lots of people of color that they weren't used to seeing on the streets where they lived.

It made me want to laugh but it also made me crazy. Not visit New York out of fear for your safety? To me, it's patently ridiculous.

The same way, I suspect, an Egyptian or an Ecuadorian would feel about us calling their big cities dangerous. Yes, there are inherent dangers to city life and you have to practice street smarts in all of them. But write off a whole place? It's only you who loses.

Photos: Ellen Perlman

Pyramids at Giza, Egypt.

My Guadalajara family.

Posted in , , , , , , ,

6 responses to “Solo female travelers shouldn’t let safety concerns put the world off limits”

  1. Kim Avatar

    I agree with you – women can travel solo in most parts of the world quite safely (I’ve met ladies who have done Africa north to south solo), but there are more dangers in certain parts of the world to women than men and some areas are just not fun to travel solo (Arab countries for eg). In the example above, it is less likely that the luggage would’ve been stolen if it was the dad watching the luggage and the mom buying the snacks. The physical threat to women is far greater because we’re less able to fight back and the ever present threat of rape (stuff is replacable, this isn’t). The best thing you can do as a single woman is to be aware of your surroundings and don’t go to places that are not safe (by local standards) alone, especially at night.
    Know where you’re going and where to stay away from. There are no-go area’s in any city / country and remember that your radar will probably not be as sensitive as a locals in any circumstances.

    Like

  2. Ellen Avatar

    Kim,
    All good points. Women have to be careful and act in a way that keeps them safe. I just don’t want solo travelers to get paranoid by what they read in the newspapers and use that to stay home. Those stories are ALWAYS going to focus on the dangers.
    Thanks for writing.
    Ellen

    Like

  3. Ted Avatar

    The article would have been even more effective if you had omitted the word “female” from the headline.
    Although women have a very understandable deep-seated fear of particular types of violent assaults, the fact is that solo travelers of either gender are at greater risk of crime than those traveling with others. A soloist is more easily distracted and more easily victimized, in the absence of those additional sets of eyes to look out for trouble.
    The most likely threat a solo traveler will encounter is the “clever thief,” the pickpocket, or perhaps the mugger. Perhaps such criminals might perceive a solo woman as a more tempting target than a solo man, but the solo traveler of either gender is inherently more vulnerable. There’s safety in numbers, after all.
    That said, your message is an appropriate one for solo travelers of either gender (or should that be “any gender”?). Neither the solo male nor the solo female should let safety concerns put the world off limits. Reasonable precautions apply to everyone. The operative word is “wary” rather than “worry.”
    My local bookstore puts the (few) books about solo travel in the section labeled “Women’s Travel.” If mainstream guidebooks mention solo travel at all, you’ll typically find it under the heading “For Women Traveling Alone.” Even Rick Steves, otherwise a paragon of inclusiveness, describes solo travel as a “women’s issue” in his “Europe Through the Back Door,” and brings in a female associate to write the applicable chapter because he can’t adequately address it (notwithstanding his own extensive solo travel experience).
    I feel marginalized and stigmatized enough as a solo traveler (especially in the United States). Seeing it continually portrayed as a “women’s issue” doesn’t help at all. Solo travel is for anyone who revels in the freedom and sheer exhilaration of independent exploration– or who at least refuses to let the lack of an available companion force him or her to stay home! And nearly all the challenges and risks that face the solo traveler apply to both sexes, as does the advice for dealing with them.
    And by the way, men can be victims of sexual assault, just as women can be amazingly effective at defending themselves against those assaults.

    Like

  4. Ellen Avatar

    Ted,
    I addressed “solo female travelers” because the article I was quoting was about solo women on the road.
    I agree that men have to be careful too and not take unnecessary risks.
    Eyes open everyone!

    Like

  5. Paz Avatar

    Great post. And it is so true! People hear one story and just write the entire location off. Bad stories always travel faster and further than the good ones…people should always keep that in mind.

    Like

  6. Ellen Avatar

    Paz,
    Exactly! And I’m often guilty of the same thing – but then I get over it.

    Like

Leave a reply to Ted Cancel reply