One of my biggest beefs is how the world views solo travelers.  As if we’re some kind of oddity, or people to be pitied. This is the opening sentence of a story by the Reuters news agency:

"No one to go on vacation with or escaping a broken heart? That’s no reason not to travel."

Give me a break. I excuse this pitiful story lead only because it was around Valentine’s Day and someone thought he/she was writing a clever tie-in to the "holiday."

As I’ve said before, I often purposely travel solo because the experience is that much richer. Instead of gabbing with a friend, I’m observing the world around me. If I’m on an active vacation, I’m meeting new and interesting people.

I don’t want to bring home with me. I don’t want to have to deal with the quirks of my friends when I’m supposed to be relaxing. And sometimes, I’d prefer that what happens on my vacations stays on my vacations, as far as the gossip chain in my regular life goes.

What I found oddest of all about the story was the top-10 list that Reuters referred to. It was created by IgoUgo, a website owned by Travelocity that’s full of reader recommendations.

Number one on the list is Vienna. This is what the says:

"Each spring for the past few years, I’ve indulged in a solo trip to Europe, usually prompted by some long-standing fantasy I’ve had. One year I tramped around Dartmoor; another found me footloose in London. But this year’s trip was one I’d dreamt about for decades: to Vienna, to sample its mind-boggling array of concerts and operas."

That’s it. 

Now someone explain to me why Vienna is a "top 10"
place to fly solo? Or why number two, Rio, which "rewards those who
travel solo" is on the list? I’m not saying these aren’t great places.
But if they’re great places, they’re also great places for couples, families and Snow White and all her dwarfs. 

In the
couple-centric travel world, this list offers no particularly useful
information to solo travelers. Was the single supplement waived? Was
there a particular place to meet up with other travelers? Did the king
or the president or the emperor throw open
the doors specifically for a solo-traveler reception?

No?

Then these are simply nice places to visit. Why
are they the top 10 places for flying solo? I’m asking this seriously.
Can anyone tell me the value of this list?

Solo travelers can go anywhere they want. And have a good time. Or not. Just like "regular" people. Shocking, but true.

If you’re going to write a story about solo travel, make it make sense. Offer a reason why a certain destination or hotel is better for solo travelers than another. Am I off base here?  I look forward to comments.

Posted in , ,

4 responses to “Solo travelers are regular people. The only difference is they book for one.”

  1. Cameron Avatar

    Cameron from IgoUgo here–as IgoUgo is a site for travel reviews and experiences from real travelers, we base all such lists on member recommendations. Therefore, if we recommend a city as a great place to travel solo, it’s because one (or more) of our members had a great solo travel experience there and recommends it to others! As you said, solo travelers are just travelers like everyone else–so a nice place to visit solo is a nice place to visit, period. But these recommendations come specifically from the solo travel experiences of our members. For more information, come to IgoUgo and read more!

    Like

  2. Ellen Avatar

    Cameron,
    Thanks for your input. We’re both saying the same thing, really. Nice places to visit are nice places to visit for everyone.
    However, the fact that some solo travelers had a good time in those places, doesn’t mean the next 100 solo travelers won’t be bored and lonely. So I still don’t see why those particular places are the top 10 places to “fly solo.”
    The way Reuters played the story, it was as if these specific cities were suited for solo travelers. More so than others.
    I find that misleading. I couldn’t find the list on your site so I don’t know how it was presented there.
    But again, thanks for checking in and explaining what the list represented.

    Like

  3. placeswegopeoplewesee Avatar

    Two things come to mind. First and foremost, newspapers and mags know that lists sell and so they do them ad nauseum. “Best this,” “top that.” Ridiculous. Second is that while you might say that solo travelers are “regular people,” which they area, you do have a blog devoted to them, so things about them do stand out. But, like you said, those things should be explained in a way that’s thoughtful. Using “solo travel” as a hook to list places is rather thought-less. Btw, tomorrow I’m off to Canada — alone!

    Like

  4. Ellen Avatar

    placeswegopeoplewesee: You’ve got it backwards. On this blog, solo travelers are the regular people. Couples are the ones that “stand out.” Hee, hee. A little solo traveler joke. Possibly the first one ever. Solo travelers unite! Si, se puede.

    Like

Leave a comment